Streamingmedia's
Industry Sourcebook -2004 edition
Web-Based
Presentations:
Mass Medium for the new Millennium
by Geoff Daily
Thanks to the Internet and streaming media, there's been
a paradigm shift in the use and delivery of presentations.
Once the medium of the lone viewer at his or her desktop or
a handful of people in a cramped meeting room, presentations
are now streaming to unlimited audiences around the globe.
And the world will never be the same.
Back in the 20th century, the Web was the Web and presentations
were presentations. One was something on the desktop or in
the meeting room; the other was something on the Internet,
but the two didn't get together much.
Most 20th century Web-based presentations solutions were
quite unattractive—
financially, technologically, and logistically—or they
simply didn't provide the function ability necessary for effective
communications. Online PowerPoint presentations were often
without video and required each individual slide to be converted
to a GIF or JPEG and uploaded separately. Video teleconferencing
was (and still is) expensive, somewhat archaic, and aimed
more at live, face-to-face communications among small groups.
Now, entering the 21st century, a new broadcasting/presentation
solution has evolved. It uses the same viewing platform as
many past offerings, the desktop computer, but does so in
a way that redefines the way we communicate. Say hello to
Web-based presentations, a multimedia communication medium
for the 21st century.
Benefits/Advantages
Online presentations mix the ease, immediacy, and interactivity
of telephony with the sensory power of multimedia through
the inexpensive and universal Internet. But what gives this
technology the upper hand in the evolution of communication
is the way in which it allows viewers to interact with presentations
and presenters to create a dialogue with their audience, as
well as its ability to present information live, via a Webcast,
or on-demand, archived in online libraries.
Interactivity takes on many forms in Web-based presentations.
Presenters can use it to learn more about their audience through
registration pages and about their audience's opinions through
online polling. Live Q & A via email (aka, moderated messaging)
provides for a discussion that can be held during or immediately
after a presentation. Email plays an important interactive
role in online training modules, sending a student's answers
to questions posed during a presentation directly to the instructor
for immediate review or grading. This kind of training also
takes advantage of being online by including hyperlinks, which
direct students to relevant Web pages, thus adding layers
of informational depth without increasing the girth of the
presentation.
With Web-based presentations, there are no blank discs to
buy or stamps to lick. Many solutions encode video and audio,
synchronize to slides or other media, and publish to the Internet
on-the-fly or (at the very least) minimize the strain of a
typical post-production process into a simple, non-technical,
and inexpensive process—if you've got the IT know-how
in-house. Conferences, annual meetings, and training can be
conducted virtually, negating the need for travel expenses
such as airplane tickets and hotel rooms. Plus, it's not necessary
for online viewers to own or download special software, since
both live and on-demand content can easily be made available
through an ordinary Web browser.
Trail Blazers
While corporate communications has been the primary driving
force behind the development of Web-based presentations, the
government has actually been the sector at the forefront—wholeheartedly
buying into and finding real-life uses for it. The state-funded
California Association for the Education of Young Children
(CAEYC) has developed the Child Development Facility Accreditation
Project (CDFAP) with the help of presentations solution provider
Vodium®. This project offers low-cost, online training
for educating licensed family childcare homes and state-funded
centers, with the overall goal of helping them achieve accreditation,
and thereby, providing better service to infants across California.
The curriculum combines video of a lead presenter, supplemental
video clips and interviews, online questions with answers
that are sent directly to accreditation centers via email,
and hyperlinks to relevant information on the Web.
Another early adopter in the government sector has been the
Air Force. The United States Air Force (USAF) Academy trains
the future pilots of unmanned aerial drones, which have been
touted as essential to the military's battlefield intelligence
and could be just as important to homeland security, once
the technology has been refined and sufficient pilots have
been trained. The audio, video, and telemetry data that these
drones continuously collect necessitated the use of streaming
technology. Unfortunately, getting that information to the
classroom in a format that was timely, accurate, and preserved
the data's inherent synchronization so that it could be effectively
used as a teaching tool wasn't easily accomplished until the
USAF turned to Web-based presentation technology, specifically,
Accordent's Presenter PRO. Now, this technology is being considered
for a broad range of military uses.
Myriad Uses/Real World Examples
Hyperion, a global leader in business performance management
software, is one company that has quickly recognized the power
of Web-based presentations. The Sunnyvale, California-based
company is currently working to make multimedia content from
its marketing department, such as customer success stories,
available online and on-demand through the "Hyperion
Zone," according to Adrian Vernon, Senior Operations
Manager at Hyperion. The Hyperion Zone is a custom, interactive
destination, developed through presentations service provider
Sawyer Media and designed to lead users through online libraries
of multimedia presentations and videos. Assisting users while
they're in the Zone is Harry Hyperion—a David Letterman-meets-James
Bond cartoon avatar voiced by Vernon. Through the avatar and
the Zone, Vernon hopes to utilize online presentations to
better and more efficiently educate Hyperion's sales force.
"Salespeople are bombarded by documents, which can't
be easily sorted through to find the most relevant. When they
do find the right one, its 100 pages long...you can condense
that whole process down into 10 minutes of video with slides,"
says Vernon. "Better educating your sales force gives
the best ROI of any investment."
Allergan, makers of the infamous Botox(among other drugs),
has already implemented a Web-based presentation system. "We
Webcast very large meetings in which nearly 1,000 concurrent
users can log on," says Sandy Clarke, Employee Communications
Manager at Allergan. Unlike Vernon, Clarke had prior experience
with an online presentation system—"However, it
didn't allow us to capture in real time and wasn't very ease
to use...very cumbersome." Clarke continues by defining
what "cumbersome" meant for her, "A lot of
pre-work had to be done, relying heavily on support from IT...had
to save each slide as a GIF or JPEG and upload to the server;
then we had to outsource the post-work…it would be days
before employees could watch it over the intranet."
Since acquiring a MediaSite Live unit from Sonic Foundry,
the only tech support she uses is to have her Webmaster nearby
during presentations to troubleshoot in case anything goes
wrong with the Internet stream. And the process of updating
slides has become effortless, enabling last-minute changes
that formerly would have proved problematic. (For more about
this solution, see sidebar: "Monkeypox and the Need for
Speed")
Some Consumer Education Needed
The ways in which Web-based presentations can increase a
company's productivity are numerous. In fact, the potential
uses encompass such a broad range that it may have actually
hampered the growth of the market. Vendors end up having to
spend more time consulting with their clients as to how they're
going to utilize the product than they do convincing them
that it's a good thing.
This problem stems from Web-based presentations being a mature
technology in a "nascent market," as Cameron Clarke,
CEO of Vodium, puts it. Over the last couple of years, educating
potential customers has been a major focus for online presentation
companies. But while there has been progress in defining terms
(such as "Webcast," for example) "Customers
still don't fully realize the benefits of these tools,"
says Clarke.
This nascence is part of the reason why many companies have
positioned themselves more as service providers than simply
software vendors. It isn't so much a product they sell, but
a package of services, encompassing even content production
in some cases. At the same time, most companies with software
to sell have no qualms with offering it on its own; it may
cost more upfront, but leveraging your company's IT know-how
can provide savings in the long run.
Currently, the majority of neophytes choose to outsource
some portion of the work, including hosting Web servers, integrating
the technology, managing data, producing content, and/or (as
mentioned earlier) consulting on how to get the most out of
this technology. The wide variety of ways to get online with
multimedia presentations takes its cue from the varying landscape
of companies' technical abilities to produce and publish in-house.
Questions To Ask Before Implementing
Those interested in successfully implementing a Web-based
presentation system have a number of questions which they
need to answer first. Once you've determined the answers to
these questions, you can go on to choose a tool or service
provider, or you can attempt to do it yourself.
• Who are the presentations aimed at, and how, where,
and when will they be watched?
• Do the presentations include time-sensitive information?
• What level of technical support can you (or do you
want to) provide, or how much do you want to do inhouse?
• Once you've got the infrastructure set up, who's
going to assure that there's content worthy of such a robust
medium that can consistently engage the audience?
Demanding Live Versus Lively On-Demand
The choice of doing presentations live versus on-demand hinges
upon the nature of the presentation and the who, how, where,
and when of the audience. Some professions require information
as it happens, as in the case of investment bankers, who must
react to earnings reports nearly instantaneously to catch
the market. Online quarterly meetings can include live interaction
with the audience, and multimedia marketing campaigns can
get off to a good start through a dramatic live announcement.
While these are opportunities for effective Webcasting, the
ability to archive them in online libraries prevents high-quality
content from disappearing into the wild, blue yonder. Thankfully,
most platforms offer the flexibility of both.
In terms of cost, Webcasting demands more resources, as it
necessitates having enough bandwidth to withstand the weight
of streaming media to hundreds or thousands of users simultaneously.
For some uses of Web-based presentations, especially training
or elearning. Webcasting can actually be counter-productive,
requiring that "students" be online during a certain
timeframe—something that shouldn't be necessary. Through
questionnaires, hyperlinks, and online polls, complete training
courses can be made interactive without the need for being
there live. On-demand frees "students" to watch
lessons at their convenience, instead of trying to force them
into an already hectic schedule. The decision to go live or
not revolves around the nature of the content rather than
the specific platform.
Is There A Doctor In-House?
There are basically three ways to implement Web presentations
in your organization: 1) hire one of the many service providers;
2) buy a standalone software tool available from a few service
providers and a few software vendors and do most of it yourself;
or 3) hire a SMIL coder and do it ALL yourself in-house.
The more you do on your own, the lower the overall overhead.
Of course, that is easier said than done. If you don't already
have the technical expertise in-house for creating Web-based
presentations, acquiring it can be a daunting and expensive
task. But, if you do have that expertise, or just really want
to implement Web-based presentations on the cheap, a couple
of options are available to you.
Microsoft Producer 2003 allows you to create multimedia PowerPoint
presentations in HTML for free. A host of partner companies
enhance PowerPoint and Producer's functionality through one-click
capturing and synchronizing of live video and audio to PowerPoint
presentations, Webcasting, interactive learning, and secure,
managed delivery systems. These third-party products and services
all come with a cost but still can create multimedia online
presentations for less cost than their all-in-one competitors.
Putting these solutions to use may be easy on an individual
basis, but incorporating multiple software tools from different
companies into an entire presentation package will take some
in-house expertise. Plus, there's no over-arching support
structure for consulting on how best to use this technology.
If you already have that technical know-how in-house, you
might want to go the route that JPMorganChase chose. "We
own our own streaming media distribution structure supported
by an internal tech group and create our own content,"
says Nicole McLane, a consultant for JPMorganChase, acting
as a production manager. This content often revolves around
training and keeping up with ever-changing tax laws. Other
uses include Webcasting earnings announcements and as a replacement
for video tele-conferencing. McLane mentions that they do
use some third-party software, namely Accordent's PresenterPRO,
but that doesn't keep them from getting their fingers dirty.
"We do a lot of coding with SMIL; it's the only way to
ensure exactness," McLane says.
SMIL (pronounced "smile") stands for Synchronized
Multimedia Integration Language. It enables simple authoring
of interactive presentations that integrate streaming audio
and video with images, text, and any other media type. Due
to it being XML-based and HTML-like, "it's really simple...the
same thing as doing a Web site," according to McLane.
She nJds tliiil when work-ing with SMIL, it's best to keep
things simple, asserting that SMIL is a picky language to
program in. Her division has developed series of templates
to circumvent that drawback.
McLane says that so far, she hasn't seen anyone but RealOne
actively creating products with SMIL 2.0, its latest incarnation.
In July 2003, RealNetworks released the source code for SMIL
2.0 to their Helix community. With this code and that of the
Helix DNA Client, Helix community developers can support the
display of complex presentations in their products. But since
becoming a W3C standard in 2001, SMIL hasn't made much progress
anywhere other than in the RealOne camp. Consequently, it's
future may be tied to that of Real's for the foreseeable future.
The 21st Century's Communications Evolution
Web-based presentations represent a new paradigm in multimedia
content, capitalizing on a growing consumer broadband infrastructure
and the movement of all media towards a digital format. But
until recently, the technology had not matured enough to the
point where it could be painlessly implemented. That point
has now been reached, although it might still be a few years
before people's attitudes towards content adjust. "The
problem is that the pace of technology is significantly greater
than the pace of change in human behavior," states Cameron
Clarke. Three generations have now grown up with television,
so receiving information from a screen is nothing new. What
Web-based presentations fundamentally alters is the way in
which users interact with that multimedia content, shifting
the experience from passively taking in to actively searching
out, or rather from a lean back in the chair to a lean forward
attitude.
Hyperion's Vernon sees at least one major remaining hurdle
to the implementation of Web-empowered presentations. "The
biggest thing isn't so much cost...there's a fear that we'd
invest in and publicize it, putting everything into an initial
launch, but then 2-3 months down the road not be able to produce
exciting content on a regular basis." And outsourcing
production, as the marketing department at Hyperion does,
isn't necessarily an option for everyone, as it's too expensive.
Viewers expect multimedia content to match the production
and entertainment value of television, a feat that usually
cannot be accomplished without additional funding, expertise,
or heavily leaning upon the creative faculties of your current
employees.
Even still, Web-based presentation technology will one day
be integral to how businesses communicate internally and externally.
And that day is just around the corner. But don't wait for
it. It will take time for your corporate culture and its attitudes
towards communications to adjust to this new way of interacting
with and receiving multimedia presentations. Get started now
so that when Web-based presentations become the 21st century's
status quo for communication—much in the same way as
cell phones and email did at the end of the 20th—you
won't be stuck in the past, eating the dust of your competitors.
The Big Guns Add Caliber
While the Web-based presentations market may be nascent.
corporate giants like Microsoft and Macromedia have made moves
during 2003 towards Web-based presentations becoming significant
technology in the near future. Microsoft released Producer
2003. a free downloadable plug-in for PowerPoint 2002 and
?003 that introduces a timeline-based approach to adding video
and that exports presentations directly to HTML. And while,
by itself, Producer doesn't offer much in the way of interactivity
or Webcasting capability, Microsoft is the 900-pound gorilla
that can define markets seemingly on a whim. Perhaps eventually
it will use Producer to dominate Web-based presentations the
way it used PowerPoint to dominate slide-based presentations.
Macromedia acquired Presedia in January 2003, and one month
later released rebranded versions of Presedia's Express Presenter
and Trainer under the Breeze product line. Both of these products
integrate multimedia content with software, such as PowerPoint,
through Macromedia's Flash for online presentations and training.
This line expanded further in October with the availability
of Breeze Live, which adds the ability to Webcast. Some of
Breeze and Breeze Lives competitors also display content via
Flash technology, but Macromedia invented it. So while they
are relatively new to the market, the future of Flash in Web-based
presentations may rest on their shoulders.
The movement of corporate giants into technology-driven markets
via acquisitions typically comes in bunches and represents
a coming-of-age Vodium CEO Cameron Clarke welcomes this trend
as a sign of growth and stabilization in the market. "It
helps establish a baseline in the industry. We're at the point
where there are a lot of ways to implement Web-based presentations..
as the market matures, there will be development towards normalization
and standardization." He hopes that this will further
educate the market, freeing companies from having to evangelize
big-picture concepts so that they can spend time defining
products by their specific features. Jereme Pitts, Vice President
of Sales and Marketing at Accordent, seconds this notion.
"Our biggest marketing expense is differentiating ourselves
from the others"
—Geoff Daily
|